You've probably come accross spamis spam. But this just makes me laugh

---

X-Gmail-Received: 6272b817e2b946fb065dc9d58b34e074e44f30b3
Delivered-To: jason.dearte@gmail.com
Received: by 10.54.63.20 with SMTP id l20cs16397wra;
Wed, 17 Aug 2005 14:57:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.38.101.2 with SMTP id y2mr353622rnb;
Wed, 17 Aug 2005 14:57:20 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <jason.dearte@gmail.com>
Received: from wlld-303-VF.educn.okstate.edu (wlld-303-VF.educn.okstate.edu [139.78.37.250])
by mx.gmail.com with SMTP id 70si628601rnc.2005.08.17.14.57.19;
Wed, 17 Aug 2005 14:57:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: neutral (gmail.com: 139.78.37.250 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of jason.dearte@gmail.com)
Message-ID: <11289987947963610620568.0349fvfy94655ut@budweiser.com>
Received: from 109 by itgwt89-b06.xo3.budweiser.com with DAV;
Wed, 17 Aug 2005 15:53:14 +0500
Reply-To: "jason.dearte@gmail.com" <jason.dearte@gmail.com>
From: "jason.dearte@gmail.com" <jason.dearte@gmail.com>
To: <jason.dearte@gmail.com>
Subject: Fw: interesting microsoft news article...
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 13:45:14 +0300

(content deleted)

---

If I'm reading this right - I sent this spam from my gmail account from Oklahoma State via budweiser.com to the same gmail account.
I hearby attest that I did no such thing.

Isn't one of the popular definitions of spam is that is has forged headers so that you cannot figgure out where it came from?
Judging by the content, this was sent by spamis, who's only purpose it seems is to broadcast it's whiny bitching about microsoft spam to as many people as possible - many of which never requested this one sided IRC-flame-war-turned-email.

That my friends is a classic demonstration of irony.